Conductive Argument, An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning

Informal Logic 33 (3):438-461 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Edited by J. Anthony Blair and Ralph H. Johnson King’s College London, UK: College Publications, 2011. Pp. vii, 1-299. Softcover. ISBN: 978-1-84890-030-1. US$ ~20

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are Conductive Arguments Possible?Jonathan Adler - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
The Myth of Conductive Arguments.Kevin Possin - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):29-33.
Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Vol 3.D. Gabbay & P. Smets (eds.) - 1998 - Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic.
The epistemic basis of defeasible reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):437-458.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-13

Downloads
48 (#324,723)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A practical study of argument.Trudy Govier - 1991 - Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
Challenge and response.Carl Wellman - 1971 - Carbondale,: Southern Illinois University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references