Communication and strong compositionality

Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):287-322 (2003)
Authors
Peter Pagin
Stockholm University
Abstract
Ordinary semantic compositionality (meaning of whole determined from meanings of parts plus composition) can serve to explain how a hearer manages to assign an appropriate meaning to a new sentence. But it does not serve to explain how the speaker manages to find an appropriate sentence for expressing a new thought. For this we would need a principle of inverse compositionality, by which the expression of a complex content is determined by the expressions of it parts and the mode of composition. But this presupposes that contents have constituent structure, and this cannot be taken for granted. However, it can be proved that if a certain principle of substitutivity is valid for a particular language, then the meanings expressed by its sentences can justifiably be treated as structured. In its simplest form, this principle says that if in a complex expression a constituent is replaced by another constituent with a different meaning, the new complex has a meaning different from the original. This principle is again inversely related to the normal compositional principle of substitutivity. The combination of ordinary and inverse compositionality is here called 'strong compositionality'. The proof is carried out in the algebraic framework developed by Wilfrid Hodges and Dag Westerståhl
Keywords algebraic semantics  Carnap  communication  compositionality  explanation  Fodor  Frege  Hodges  language  language of thought  meaning  semantics  structured meanings  syntax  universal algebra  Westerståhl
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1024258529030
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,425
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Meaning and Necessity.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants.Peter Pagin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (3):250-264.
The Composition of Thoughts.Richard Heck & Robert May - 2011 - Noûs 45 (1):126-166.
Compositionality II: Arguments and Problems.Peter Pagin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (3):265-282.
Hornsby on the Phenomenology of Speech.Jennifer Hornsby & Jason Stanley - 2005 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):131–145.
What is Communicative Success?Peter Pagin - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):pp. 85-115.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
95 ( #64,900 of 2,267,113 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #210,707 of 2,267,113 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature