Abstract
The Euthyphro objection is often perceived, rightly or wrongly, as the king objection to theistic meta-ethics. This paper proposes a response that hasn’t been much explored within the contemporary literature, based on the metaphysics of dispositions and natural law theory. The paper will first contend that there is a parallel between ways theists conceptualise God’s role in creating laws of nature and the ways God creates goods. Drawing upon these parallels I propose a possible response to the dilemma, where this response parallels the dispositionalist response as to how God creates laws of nature. I do this by first explicating a natural law theory of goodness, then suggesting how the ontology of dispositions can be used in a novel way to account for goods, and finally by explaining how all this relates to the dilemma. I conclude the paper by posing some objections to myself and providing some replies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-017-9632-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Nature’s Metaphysics.Alexander Bird - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Scientific Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
From an Ontological Point of View.John Heil - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Essence and Modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:1-16.
Natural Goodness.Philippa Foot - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 136 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Theistic Ethics and the Euthyphro Dilemma.Richard Joyce - 2002 - Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (1):49-75.
Can God’s Goodness Save the Divine Command Theory From Euthyphro?Jeremy Koons - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (1):177-195.
What Euthyphro Couldn’T Have Said.James G. Hanink & Gary R. Mar - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (3):241-261.
Euthyphro, the Good, and the Right.John Milliken - 2009 - Philosophia Christi 11 (1):149-159.
A Way Out of the Euthyphro Dilemma.Nick Zangwill - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):7 - 13.
God and Morality.Derrick Farnell - 2005 - Think 4 (10):43-52.
Euthyphro’s "Dilemma", Socrates’ Daimonion and Plato’s God.Timothy Chappell - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):39 - 64.
A Missed Encounter: Plato’s Socrates and Geach’s Euthyphro.A. E. Benjamin - 1987 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 29 (1):145-170.
Theistic Activism and the Euthyphro Dilemma.David James Baggett - 2002 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
A New Euthyphro.Glenn Peoples - 2010 - Think 9 (25):65-83.
Morality is Real, Objective, and Supernatural.Christian Miller - 2016 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:74-82.
A Missed Encounter.A. E. Benjamin - 1987 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 29 (1):145-170.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-05-25

Total views
28 ( #348,596 of 2,330,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #121,296 of 2,330,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes