Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding [Book Review]

Argumentation 25 (2):127-139 (2011)
Abstract
Traditionally, an enthymeme is an incomplete argument, made so by the absence of one or more of its constituent statements. An enthymeme resolution strategy is a set of procedures for finding those missing elements, thus reconstructing the enthymemes and restoring its meaning. It is widely held that a condition on the adequacy of such procedures is that statements restored to an enthymeme produce an argument that is good in some given respect in relation to which the enthymeme itself is bad. In previous work, we emphasized the role of parsimony in enthymeme resolution strategies and concomitantly downplayed the role of charity . In the present paper, we take the analysis of enthymemes a step further. We will propose that if the pragmatic features that attend the phenomenon of enthymematic communication are duly heeded, the very idea of reconstructing enthymemes loses much of its rationale, and their interpretation comes to be conceived in a new light
Keywords Enthymemes  Bounded rationality  Interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Enthymematic Parsimony.Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):461 - 501.
Enthymemes, Common Knowledge, and Plausible Inference.Douglas N. Walton - 2001 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (2):93-112.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Enthymematic Parsimony.Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):461 - 501.
Enthymemes.Hans Kamp - 1969 - Santa Monica, Calif., System Development.
When is a Fallacy Not a Fallacy?Joel Marks - 1988 - Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):307-312.
The Paradoxical Associated Conditional of Enthymemes.Gilbert Plumer - 2000 - In Christopher W. Tindale, Hans V. Hansen & Elmar Sveda (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-8.
Entailment, Enthymemes, and Formalization.John E. Nolt - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (10):572-573.
Enthymemes: Body and Soul.Arthur B. Miller & John D. Bee - 1972 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (4):201 - 214.
Enthymemes in Propositional Logic.Nelson Pole - 1980 - Teaching Philosophy 3 (3):325-330.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Enthymemes.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap Jr - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (23):713-723.
Added to PP index
2011-04-18

Total downloads
39 ( #144,458 of 2,210,428 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #387,753 of 2,210,428 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature