Hobbes Studies 33 (1):29-53 (2020)

Abstract
This article challenges the idea that Hobbes presents a negative anthropology and shows, to the contrary, that there is a thick web of social relations in his state of nature and laws of nature. It considers the contradiction between human natural equality claimed by Hobbes, and female subjection that de facto characterizes most of his passages on gender relations. The key to this puzzle is found in comparison of the notions of conquest and consent, and of acquisition and institution, comparisons that establish a similarity between paternal authority and despotic dominion. A step towards the solution is provided by the hypothesis that the divide between “vainglorious” and “moderate” is gendered, with women more disposed to moderation than men. This can be explained by the idea that, “for society’s sake,” women in the state of nature appreciate more the advantages of long-term cooperation, even at the price of some subordination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18750257-bja10002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

As relações internacionais no pensamento de Thomas Hobbes.Gabriel Ribeiro Barnabé - 2009 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 14 (1):45-77.
Odi Et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature.Andrés Rosler - 2011 - Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111.
Hobbes on the International Rule of Law.David Dyzenhaus - 2014 - Ethics and International Affairs 28 (1):53-64.
Hobbes and Terrorism.David Lay Williams - 2009 - Critical Review 21 (1):91-108.
Geometry and the Science of Morality in Hobbes.Stephen Finn - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:57-66.
Geometry and the Science of Morality in Hobbes.Stephen Finn - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:57-66.
Baiting the Bear: The Anglicant Attack on Hobbes in the Later 1660s.Jon Parkin - 2013 - History of Political Thought 34 (3):421-458.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-25

Total views
5 ( #1,111,183 of 2,349,674 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #148,473 of 2,349,674 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes