Power-ing up neo-aristotelian natural goodness

Philosophical Studies 178 (11):3755-3775 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Something is good insofar as it achieves its end, so says a neo-Aristotelian view of goodness. Powers/dispositions are paradigm cases of entities that have an end, so say many metaphysicians. A question therefore arises, namely, can one account for neo-Aristotelian goodness in terms of an ontology of powers? This is what I shallbeginto explore in this paper. I will first provide a brief explication of both neo-Aristotelian goodness and the metaphysics of powers, before turning to investigate whether one can give an account of neo-Aristotelian goodness in terms of powers. I will suggest that the answer to this question is yes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-16

Downloads
126 (#151,131)

6 months
35 (#118,259)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Page
Pembroke College, University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Teleological powers.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 62 (4):336-358.
The good and the powers.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2023 - Analytic Philosophy:1-30.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Warrant and proper function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties.Alexander Bird - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.

View all 84 references / Add more references