BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):10- (2012)

Background: The four principles of Beauchamp and Childress - autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice - havebeen extremely influential in the field of medical ethics, and are fundamental for understanding the currentapproach to ethical assessment in health care. This study tests whether these principles can be quantitativelymeasured on an individual level, and then subsequently if they are used in the decision making process whenindividuals are faced with ethical dilemmas. Methods: The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used as a tool for the measurement of the principles. Four scenarios, whichinvolved conflicts between the medical ethical principles, were presented to participants and they madejudgments about the ethicality of the action in the scenario, and their intentions to act in the same manner if theywere in the situation. Results: Individual preferences for these medical ethical principles can be measured using the Analytic HierarchyProcess. This technique provides a useful tool in which to highlight individual medical ethical values. Onaverage individuals have a significant preference for non-maleficence over the other principles, however, andperhaps counter-intuitively, this preference does not seem to relate to applied ethical judgements in specificethical dilemmas. Conclusions: People state they value these medical ethical principles but they do not actually seem to use them directly in thedecision making process. The reasons for this are explained through the lack of a behavioural model to accountfor the relevant situational factors not captured by the principles. The limitations of the principles in predictingethical decision making are discussed
Keywords Ethical principles  Hierarchies  Medical ethics  Analytic hierarchy process
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
The Tyranny of Principles.Stephen Toulmin - 1981 - Hastings Center Report 11 (6):31-39.
Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics.John Arras - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):29-51.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Ido Millet - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1197-1204.
Making Sense of Medical Ethics: A Hands-on Guide.Alan G. Johnson - 2006 - Distributed in the U.S.A. By Oxford University Press.
Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? [REVIEW]Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.
When Ethics Survive Where People Do Not.G. M. A. Hussein - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (1):72-77.
Emotion and Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations.Alice Gaudine & Linda Thorne - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (2):175 - 187.


Added to PP index

Total views
53 ( #196,044 of 2,439,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,027 of 2,439,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes