Amusement and the philosophy of emotion: A neuroanatomical approach

Dialogue 46 (3):419-434 (2007)
Philosophers who discuss the emotions have usually treated amusement as a non-emotional mental state. Two prominent philosophers making this claim are Henri Bergson and John Morreall, who maintain that amusement is too abstract and intellectual to qualify as an emotion. Here, the merit of this claim is assessed. Through recent work in neuroanatomy there is reason to doubt the legitimacy of dichotomies that separate emotion and the intellect. Findings suggest that the neuroanatomical structure of amusement is similar to other commonly recognized emotion states. On the basis of these it is argued that amusement should be considered an emotion. Les philosophes qui adressent la question des émotions traitent généralement l’état d’amusement comme un êtat mental excluant l’émotion. Parmi les philosophes importants à défendre cette thèse, Henri Bergson et John Morreall soutiennent que l’amusement est trop abstrait et intellectuel pour être tenu pour une émotion. Nous réévaluons cette thèse. De récents travaux en neuroanatomie fournissent des raisons de douter de la légitimité de la dichotomie entre émotion et intellect. Certaines autres découvertes suggèrent que la structure neuroanatomique de l’amusement est très similaire à d’autres états émotifs. Sur la base de ces travaux, nous argumentons que l’amusement doit être considéré comme une émotion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300001992
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Narcissism in Emotion.David Pugmire - 2002 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):313-326.
Emotion Explained.T. Rolls Edmund - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
The Feeling Theory of Emotion and the Object-Directed Emotions.Demian Whiting - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):281-303.
The Function and Content of Amusement.Ward E. Jones - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):126-137.
Seven Reasons Why Amusement is an Emotion.Robert A. Sharpe - 1975 - Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (3):201-203.
Truly Funny: Humor, Irony, and Satire as Moral Criticism.E. M. Dadlez - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):1-17.
Is Amusement an Emotion?Robert C. Roberts - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (July):269-274.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
17 ( #288,784 of 2,180,853 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,627 of 2,180,853 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums