PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:135 - 142 (1988)
If a computational account of visual perception were correct, then perception would involve at least two sorts of rule-guided inference processes: inference from primitive input to complex perceptual output (constructional inference) and inference from perceptual content to the organism's environment (representational inference). Psychologist J.J. Gibson argues that such accounts are circular. Fodor and Pylyshyn argue that Gibson's alternative account, though intended to be non-inferential, actually requires the above two sorts of inference. But their arguments for the necessity of inference work only if (1) complex properties cannot be transduced, and (2) we assume a signal transmission model of perception. The force of their arguments is weakened once we see that (1) their criterion for non-transducibility is itself problematic, and (2) an interactive model of visual perception does not require signal transmission.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Beyond Inference in Perception.Stephen P. Stich - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:553 - 560.
The Epistemological Status of Vision and its Implications for Design.Dhanraj Vishwanath - 2004 - Axiomathes 15 (3):399-486.
Determining the Primary Problem of Visual Perception: A Gibsonian Response to the Correlation' Objection.Philip A. Glotzbach - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):69-94.
Dynamic Imagery: A Computational Model of Motion and Visual Analogy.David Croft & Paul Thagard - unknown
Visual Models in Analogical Problem Solving.Jim Davies, Nancy J. Nersessian & Ashok K. Goel - 2005 - Foundations of Science 10 (1):133-152.
Perception, Inference, and the Veridicality of Natural Constraints.Manish Singh & Donald D. Hoffman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):395-396.
Hallucinations and Perceptual Inference.Karl J. Friston - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):764-766.
The Praxiology of Perception: Visual Orientations and Practical Action.Jeff Coulter - 1990 - Inquiry 251 (September):251-272.
Visual Perception and the Wages of Indeterminacy.Richard Montgomery - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:365 - 378.
L. Albertazzi, G. J. Van Tonder, and D. Vishwanath (Eds): Perception Beyond Inference: The Information Content of Visual Processes. [REVIEW]Lorenzo Magnani - 2012 - Minds and Machines 22 (1):53-55.
The Perception of Material Qualities and the Internal Semantics of the Perceptual System.Rainer Mausfeld - 2010 - In Albertazzi Liliana, Tonder Gert & Vishwanath Dhanraj (eds.), Perception beyond Inference. The Information Content of Visual Processes. MIT Press.
Inference to the Best Explanation: Is It Really Different From Mill's Methods?Steven Rappaport - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):65-80.
Why People See Things That Are Not There: A Novel Perception and Attention Deficit Model for Recurrent Complex Visual Hallucinations.Daniel Collerton, Elaine Perry & Ian McKeith - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):737-757.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #595,800 of 2,164,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,950 of 2,164,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?