Ethics 121 (1):116-147 (2010)
Kant's Formula of Humanity famously forbids treating others merely as a means. It is unclear, however, what exactly treating someone merely as a means comes to. This essay argues against an interpretation of this idea advanced by Christine Korsgaard and Onora O'Neill. The essay then develops a new interpretation that suggests an important connection between the Formula of Humanity and Kant's political philosophy: the content of many of our moral duties depends on the results of political philosophy and, indeed, on the results of actual political decision making.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Non-Aristotelian Political Animals.Ben Bryan - 2015 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (4):293-311.
Similar books and articles
On the Universal Law and Humanity Formulas.Sven Nyholm - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Kant on the Wrongness of 'Unnatural' Sex.Lara Denis - 1999 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (2):225-48.
Freedom and the Source of Value: Korsgaard and Wood on Kant's Formula of Humanity.Christopher Arroyo - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (4):353-359.
Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself.Lara Denis - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
Kant's Formula of the End in Itself: Some Recent Debates.Lara Denis - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):244–257.
How to Argue for the Value of Humanity.Adrienne Martin - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):96-125.
Reason Alone Cannot Identify Moral Laws.Noriaki Iwasa - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (1-2):67-85.
Added to index2010-12-04
Total downloads168 ( #26,424 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #76,939 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?