Equality, Efficiency, and Sufficiency: Responding to Multiple Parameters of Distributive Justice During Charitable Distribution

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (4):659-674 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Distributive justice decision making tends to require a trade off between different valued outcomes. The present study tracked computer mouse cursor movements in a forced-choice paradigm to examine for tension between different parameters of distributive justice during the decision-making process. Participants chose between set meal distributions, to third parties, that maximised either equality (the evenness of the distribution) or efficiency (the total number of meals distributed). Across different formulations of these dilemmas, responding was consistent with the notion that individuals tend to base decisions in part on the magnitude of these parameters. In addition, dilemmas associated with inconsistent responding across the sample tended to elicit the greatest spatial deviation of the cursor, potentially reflecting dilemma difficulty. One interpretation of these results is that individuals value equality and efficiency in such a way that moral dilemmas are resolved by comparing the perceived value of these qualitatively different parameters, consistent with a value pluralistic framework of decision making. A post-hoc analysis indicated that individuals also incorporated sufficiency concerns during distributive justice decision making. The results are discussed in relation to political philosophy

Similar books and articles

Response.Michael Walzer - 1995 - In David Miller & Michael Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford University Press.
Contextualism, Pluralism, and Distributive Justice.David Sidorsky - 1983 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1):172.
Taking equality seriously.Eva Maria Parisi - 2020 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universit√§t, M√ľnchen
Complex Equality.David Miller - 1995 - In David Miller & Michael Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford University Press.
Desert and justice.Serena Olsaretti (ed.) - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotelian Distributive Justice: Holism or Egalitarianism. Di Wu - 2017 - Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 31 (6):60-64.
Distributive sufficiency, inequality-blindness and disrespectful treatment.Vincent Harting - 2024 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 27 (4):429-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-26

Downloads
70 (#239,830)

6 months
782 (#1,483)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jakob Hohwy
Monash University
Linda Barclay
Monash University

References found in this work

Equality as a moral ideal.Harry Frankfurt - 1987 - Ethics 98 (1):21-43.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
Inequality.Larry Temkin - 1995 - Ethics 105 (3):663-665.
Equality as a Moral Ideal.Harry Frankfurt - 1997 - In Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland (eds.), Equality: Selected Readings. Oup Usa.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1997 - In Louis P. Pojman & Robert Westmoreland (eds.), Equality: Selected Readings. Oup Usa.

View all 8 references / Add more references