Equality, Efficiency, and Sufficiency: Responding to Multiple Parameters of Distributive Justice During Charitable Distribution

Authors
Jakob Hohwy
Monash University
Linda Barclay
Monash University
Abstract
Distributive justice decision making tends to require a trade off between different valued outcomes. The present study tracked computer mouse cursor movements in a forced-choice paradigm to examine for tension between different parameters of distributive justice during the decision-making process. Participants chose between set meal distributions, to third parties, that maximised either equality (the evenness of the distribution) or efficiency (the total number of meals distributed). Across different formulations of these dilemmas, responding was consistent with the notion that individuals tend to base decisions in part on the magnitude of these parameters. In addition, dilemmas associated with inconsistent responding across the sample tended to elicit the greatest spatial deviation of the cursor, potentially reflecting dilemma difficulty. One interpretation of these results is that individuals value equality and efficiency in such a way that moral dilemmas are resolved by comparing the perceived value of these qualitatively different parameters, consistent with a value pluralistic framework of decision making. A post-hoc analysis indicated that individuals also incorporated sufficiency concerns during distributive justice decision making. The results are discussed in relation to political philosophy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13164-013-0157-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Defence of Democratic Egalitarianism.Sagar Sanyal - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (7):413-34.
Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions.Christian Schemmel - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):365-390.
Distributive Justice, Injustice and Beyond Justice.Wei Xiaopin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:857-872.
Proportionality, Winner-Take-All, and Distributive Justice.Mark R. Reiff - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):5-42.
Equal Justice.Eric Rakowski - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Justice Beyond Equality.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):315-340.
Distributive Justice in Crisis.Eldar Sarajlic - 2011 - CEU Political Science Journal 6 (3):458-483.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-26

Total views
407 ( #9,819 of 2,313,339 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #24,861 of 2,313,339 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature