Experiments, mathematics, physical causes: How mersenne came to doubt the validity of Galileo's law of free fall

Perspectives on Science 18 (1):pp. 50-76 (2010)
Abstract
In the ten years following the publication of Galileo Galilei's Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze , the new science of motion was intensely debated in Italy, France and northern Europe. Although Galileo's theories were interpreted and reworked in a variety of ways, it is possible to identify some crucial issues on which the attention of natural philosophers converged, namely the possibility of complementing Galileo's theory of natural acceleration with a physical explanation of gravity; the legitimacy of Galileo's methods of proof and of his theory of the composition of continuous magnitudes; and the adequacy of the experimental evidence in favor of his theory.Through his published works and his correspondence, Marin Mersenne contributed in a significant way to each of these discussions. In the following, I shall provide a sketch of Mersenne's multiple engagement with the new science of motion, while trying to account for his growing skepticism concerning Galileo's law of free fall. Whereas in the 1630s, Mersenne still firmly believed in the validity of this law and tried to devise experimental and mathematical proofs in its favor, in the 1640s he developed serious doubts regarding the possibility of constructing an exact science of motion. As we shall see, Mersenne's evolving attitude sheds an interesting light on his views concerning the relation between physics and mathematics.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2010.18.1.50
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Free Fall From Albert of Saxony to Honoré Fabri.Stillman Drake - 1975 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 5 (4):347-366.
Free Fall From Albert of Saxony to Honoré Fabri.Stillman Drake - 1975 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 5 (4):347.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-02-06

Total downloads
21 ( #273,293 of 2,235,790 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #268,116 of 2,235,790 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature