Ethics of Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: A Habermasian Perspective

Bioethics 31 (1):27-36 (2017)

Jürgen Habermas is regarded as a central bioconservative commentator in the debate on the ethics of human prenatal genetic manipulations. While his main work on this topic, The Future of Human Nature, has been widely examined in regard to his position on prenatal genetic enhancement, his arguments regarding prenatal genetic therapeutic interventions have for the most part been overlooked. In this work I do two things. First, I present the three necessary conditions that Habermas establishes for a prenatal genetic manipulation to be regarded as morally permissible. Second, I examine if mitochondrial replacement techniques meet these necessary conditions. I investigate, specifically, the moral permissibility of employing pronuclear transfer and maternal spindle transfer. I conclude that, according to a Habermasian perspective on prenatal genetic manipulation, maternal spindle transfer and pronuclear transfer are morally impermissible. Maternal spindle transfer is, in principle, morally permissible, but only when we have beforehand preselected a sperm and an egg for our reproductive purpose. These findings are relevant for bioconservatives, both for those who hold a Habermasian stance and for those who hold something akin to a Habermasian stance, because they answer the question: what should bioconservatives do regarding mitochondrial replacement techniques? In fact, the answer to this question does not only normatively prescribe what bioconservatives should do in terms of their personal morality, but it also points towards what kind of legislation regulating mitochondrial replacement techniques they should aim at.
Keywords mitochondrial replacement techniques  three parent babies  Habermas  prenatal genetic manipulation  mitochondrial donation  pronuclear transfer  three parent IVF  mitochondrial replacement therapy  maternal spindle transfer
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12307
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,857
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.
The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Trevor Stammers - 2013 - The New Bioethics 19 (1):1-1.
What Is the Value of Three-Parent IVF?Tina Rulli - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (4):38-47.
Genetics and Bioethics: How Our Thinking has Changed Since 1969.LeRoy Walters - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):83-95.
Gene Replacement Therapy in the CNS: A View From the Retina.Gail M. Seigel - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):69-69.
Virtue Ethics and Prenatal Genetic Enhancement.Colin Farrelly - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #498,731 of 2,309,550 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #522,442 of 2,309,550 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature