Erratum to: Would Human Extinction Be Morally Wrong?

Philosophia 43 (3):915-915 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Erratum to: Philosophia 42:1063–1084DOI10.1007/s11406-014-9553-7The original version of this article unfortunately includes some imperfections. The correct details are given below.In the second paragraph of the text, references to Leslie 2002 are actually to Leslie 1996.At note 23, the sentence “even if in so doing I would not make A’s condition overall worse” should be replaced by “even if in so doing I would not make B’s condition overall worse”; in the following period, an “if” should be inserted between “even” and “it”.In the last page of the third paragraph, the sentence “would result in a strong violation of some kind of duty toward already existing people than” is intended substituted by the following one: “would result in a violation of some kind of duty toward already existing people, then,”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Would Human Extinction Be Morally Wrong?Franco Palazzi - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (4):1063-1084.
The Paradox of Deontology, Revisited.Ulrike Heuer - 2011 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 1. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 236-67.
Persons and their copies.D. McCarthy - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):98-104.
Bringing about equality.Christopher Marshall - 2017 - Dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science (Lse)

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-19

Downloads
25 (#753,107)

6 months
5 (#898,127)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references