Improving the quality of consent to randomised controlled trials by using continuous consent and clinician training in the consent process
Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):439-443 (2006)
AbstractObjective: To assess whether continuous consent, a process in which information is given to research participants at different stages in a trial, and clinician training in that process were effective when used by clinicians while gaining consent to the Total Body Hypothermia (TOBY) trial. The TOBY trial is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the use of whole-body cooling for neonates with evidence of perinatal asphyxia. Obtaining valid informed consent for the TOBY trial is difficult, but is a good test of the effectiveness of continuous consent. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 30 sets of parents who consented to the TOBY trial and with 10 clinicians who sought it by the continuous consent process. Analysis was focused on the validity of parental consent based on the consent components of competence, information, understanding and voluntariness. Results: No marked problems with consent validity at the point of signature were observed in 19 of 27 (70%) couples. Problems were found mainly to lie with the competence and understanding of the parents: mothers, particularly, had problems with competence in the early stages of consent. Problems in understanding were primarily to do with side effects. Problems in both competence and understanding were observed to reduce markedly, particularly for mothers, in the post-signature phase, when further discussion took place. Randomisation was generally understood but unpopular. Information was not always given by clinicians in stages during the short period available before parents gave consent. Most clinicians, however, were able to give follow-up information. Discussion: Consent validity was found to compare favourably with similar trials examined in the Euricon study. Conclusion: Adopting the elements of the continuous consent process and clinician training in RCTs should be considered by researchers, particularly when they have concerns about the quality of consent they are likely to obtain by using a conventional process.
Similar books and articles
Continuous consent and dignity in dentistry.David Shaw - 2007 - British Dental Journal 203 (11):569-571.
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: Informed consent.Janet L. Brody, John P. Cluck & Alfredo S. Aragon - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):285 – 298.
Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Consent and informational responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
“There is no evidence to suggest …”: Changing The Way We Judge Information For Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process.Leslie Cannold - 1997 - Hypatia 12 (2):165 - 184.
Effectively obtaining informed consent for child and adolescent participation in mental health research.Benedetto Vitiello - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):182 – 198.
Enhancing clinician provision of informed consent and counseling: Some pedagogical strategies.Stephen Wear - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):34 – 42.
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent.Jane L. Hutton & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (1):41-53.
Hide-and-seek or show-and-tell? Emerging issues of informed consent.Leonard J. Haas - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (3):175 – 189.
A Puzzle about Consent in Research and in Practice.Eric Chwang - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):258-272.
Victimless Conduct and the Volenti Maxim: How Consent Works. [REVIEW]Michelle Madden Dempsey - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):11-27.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?Valerie Shilling & Bridget Young - 2009 - BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):1-.
Trust and consent: a prospective study on parents’ perspective during a neonatal trial.Sonia Dahan, Camille Jung, Gilles Dassieu, Xavier Durrmeyer & Laurence Caeymaex - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (10):678-683.
Does Informed Consent Have an Expiry Date? A Critical Reappraisal of Informed Consent as a Process.Gert Helgesson & Stefan Eriksson - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):85-92.
Taking part in a pharmacogenetic clinical trial: assessment of trial participants understanding of information disclosed during the informed consent process. [REVIEW]Diana Rose, Jasna Russo & Til Wykes - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):34.
Why do parents enrol their children in research: a narrative synthesis.H. R. Fisher, C. McKevitt & A. Boaz - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (9):544-551.
References found in this work
Empirical Research on Informed Consent: An Annotated Bibliography.Jeremy Sugarman, Douglas C. McCrory, Donald Powell, Alex Krasny, Betsy Adams, Eric Ball & Cynthia Cassell - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (1):1-42.
The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials.W. A. Silverman - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):6-11.