Authors
Eric Palmer
Allegheny College
Abstract
Imre Lakatos' conception of the history of science is explicated with the purpose of replying to criticism leveled against it by Thomas Kuhn, Ian Hacking, and others. Kuhn's primary argument is that the historian's internal—external distinction is methodologically superior to Lakatos' because it is "independent" of an analysis of rationality. That distinction, however, appears to be a normative one, harboring an implicit and unarticulated appeal to rationality, despite Kuhn's claims to the contrary. Lakatos' history, by contrast, is clearly the history of a normatively defined discipline; of science and not scientists and their activities. How such history can be written, the historiographic and critical tools available for its construction, and its importance as history, are considered in detail. In an afterword, the prevalence of Lakatos' treatment of history in philosophical discussion is indicated: A related approach is shown to arise in social contract theory.
Keywords Lakatos  Internal History  Scientific Methodology  Philosophy of History
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Internal History Versus External History.Bence Nanay - 2017 - Philosophy 92 (2):207-230.
Assaying Lakatos's Philosophy of Mathematics.David Corfield - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (1):99-121.
Against Generality: Meaning in Genetics and Philosophy.Richard M. Burian, Robert C. Richardson & Wim J. Van der Steen - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):1-29.
The 'Popperian Programme' and Mathematics.Eduard Glas - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):119-137.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lakatos as Historian of Mathematics.Brendan P. Larvor - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (1):42-64.
Curried Lakatos or, How Not to Spice Up the Norm-Ladenness Thesis.Stephen J. Wykstra - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:29 - 39.
Rational Reconstruction Reconsidered.Bence Nanay - 2010 - The Monist 93 (4):598-617.
Philosophy of Science and History3 of Science: A Non Troubling Interaction. [REVIEW]F. Michael Akeroyd - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):159-162.
Chocolate and Chess (Unlocking Lakatos). [REVIEW]John Kadvany - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):276-286.
Lakatos' Philosophy of Mathematics: A Historical Approach.T. Koetsier - 1991 - Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-30

Total views
238 ( #32,116 of 2,325,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #36,782 of 2,325,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes