Authors
Eric Palmer
Allegheny College
Abstract
The classic formulation of doubt regarding the appropriateness of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), as voiced by Milton Friedman, is that “…there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game…” I present a reply to Friedman, and to others, that accepts their implicit premise – that business, including globalizing business activity, can be a virtuous mechanism of free society – but that denies their conclusion regarding responsibility. The reply does not fit the traditional mold of CSR arguments, which argue for responsibility to a broad group of corporate stakeholders, and which, Friedman suggests, “undermine the very foundations of our free society.” My reply hinges upon precisely the virtue of “freedom” that Friedman and others clearly consider intrinsically valuable. In the most extreme case, where maximizing profits will place a government under threat, such activity will not coincide with maximizing social value, and would undermine the freedoms that these authors claim to value. Concerning less extreme cases, responsibilities will also apply, if we can take a page from the capabilities approach, developing Amartya Sen’s argument that, “we have to see individual freedom as a social commitment.”.
Keywords Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-0-9763264-4-1
DOI iabsproc20061738
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Corporate Responsibility and Freedom.Eric Palmer - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:25-33.
GM and Corporate Responsibility.Richard T. George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.
Friedman’s “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”.Craig P. Dunn & Brian K. Burton - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:292-295.
Equal Financial Returns of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility.Peter deMaCarty - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:99-104.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-18

Total views
40 ( #235,047 of 2,326,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #435,731 of 2,326,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes