Mandatory Neurointerventions Could Enhance the Mental Integrity of Certain Criminal Offenders

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):150-152 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2018.1496174

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Neural and Environmental Modulation of Motivation: What's the Moral Difference?Thomas Douglas - forthcoming - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Self-Control in Responsibility Enhancement and Criminal Rehabilitation.Polaris Koi, Susanne Uusitalo & Jarno Tuominen - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (2):227-244.
Neuro-interventions as Criminal Rehabilitation: An Ethical Review.Jonathan Pugh & Thomas Douglas - 2016 - In Jonathan Jacobs & Jonathan Jackson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics. Routledge.
If Criminal Intentions Are Nonvoluntary, Mandatory Neurointerventions Might Be Permissible.Andrea Lavazza - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):154-156.
Incarceration, Direct Brain Intervention, and the Right to Mental Integrity – a Reply to Thomas Douglas.Jared N. Craig - 2016 - Neuroethics 9 (2):107-118.
‘Drugs That Make You Feel Bad’? Remorse-Based Mitigation and Neurointerventions.Jonathan Pugh & Hannah Maslen - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):499-522.
Coercion and the Neurocorrective Offer.Jonathan Pugh - forthcoming - In David Rhys Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), reatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford, UK:
Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity.Thomas Douglas - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):101-122.
Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn.Thomas Douglas - 2016 - Neuroethics 12 (1):107-118.
Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions.Peter Vallentyne - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):131-132.
Legal Punishment and the Public Identification of Offenders.Richard L. Lippke - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (2):199-216.
The Use of Criminal Record in Employment Decisions: The Rights of Ex-Offenders, Employers and the Public.Helen Lam & Mark Harcourt - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (3):237 - 252.
The Right to Bodily Integrity and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Through Medical Interventions: A Reply to Thomas Douglas.Elizabeth Shaw - 2016 - Neuroethics 12 (1):97-106.
Neurointerventions in Offenders: Ethical Considerations.Shichun Ling & Adrian Raine - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):146-148.
Mandatory Neurointerventions and the Risk of Racial Disparity.Timothy Emmanuel Brown - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):156-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-22

Downloads
23 (#644,212)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Palk
University of Stellenbosch

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Psychopathology and the Ability to Do Otherwise.Hanna Pickard - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):135-163.

Add more references