Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy

Oxford University Press UK (2009)

John Palmer develops and defends a modal interpretation of Parmenides, according to which he was the first philosopher to distinguish in a rigorous manner the fundamental modalities of necessary being, necessary non-being or impossibility, and non-necessary or contingent being. This book accordingly reconsiders his place in the historical development of Presocratic philosophy in light of this new interpretation. Careful treatment of Parmenides' specification of the ways of inquiry that define his metaphysical and epistemological outlook paves the way for detailed analyses of his arguments demonstrating the temporal and spatial attributes of what is and cannot not be. An appendix presents a Greek text of the fragments of Parmenides' poem with English translation and textual notes.
Keywords Eleatics  Pre-Socratic philosophers
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
Buy the book $47.10 new (64% off)   $83.84 used (36% off)   $130.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number B235.P24.P35 2009
ISBN(s) 9780199664696   9780199567904   0199567905
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,984
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA
Parmenides' Place in Histories of Presocratic Philosophy

This introductory chapter provides the orientation necessary to appreciate what is at stake in the book's development and defence of a modal interpretation of Parmenides. It focuses on the principal features of the narrative that typically structures accounts of early Greek philosophy's br... see more

The Way of the Goddess and the Way of Mortals

This chapter focuses on the goddess's directives to Parmenides in fragments 3, 6, and 7. In fragment 6, the goddess instructs Parmenides on how to remain on the first way of inquiry and criticizes ordinary mortals for mistakenly supposing that the object of true understanding is subject to... see more

Parmenides' Place in Presocratic Philosophy

After providing a retrospective summation of the modal interpretation of Parmenides developed in Chapters 2 tohrough 4, this concluding chapter reconsiders in light of these results his relation to Empedocles and Xenophanes, to his Milesian predecessors, and to Heraclitus, all with a view ... see more

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

El testimonio de Aristóteles sobre Zenòn de Elea como un detractor de "lo uno".Mariana Gardella - 2015 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 23:157-181.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. [REVIEW]Matthew R. Cosgrove - 2012 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):131-132.
Plato's Parmenides: A Principle of Interpretation and Seven Arguments.Sandra Peterson - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):167-192.
Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy by John Palmer.Barbara Michaela Sattler - 2014 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 107 (3):421-423.
Parmenides' Modal Fallacy.Frank Lewis - 2009 - Phronesis 54 (1):1-8.
Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. By John Palmer.John Sisko - 2012 - Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):407-415.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #156,596 of 2,319,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #149,439 of 2,319,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature