Restorashyn: Ecofeminist restoration

Environmental Ethics 28 (3):285-301 (2006)
Most restoration projects are designed to approximate the species composition and ecotypes ecologists and historians determine were present in an area at some point in the historical past. In most cases, although somewhat arbitrary, the specific time chosen is based on an understanding of historic species composition and anthropogenic disturbances.Although restoring an area to the estimated, historical vegetation types is widely accepted, the exclusory nature of the restoration process often actively eliminates not just invasive species, but also non-invasive, nonnative species as well as displaced native species. These exclusory activities echo patterns of domination and degradation that led to a need for restoration in the first place. Although the domination present in restoration stems from an earnest desire to repair harms inflicted by human carelessness, it at the same time enforces a human conception of the ideal landscape. Attending to ecofeminist concepts such as inclusivism and pluralism, and embracing their rejection of dualistic thinking and the logic of domination demands an expanded tolerance within the practice of ecological restoration. An expanded ecofeminist conceptualization of restoration, a restorashyn, attempts to reduce the presence of overt human domination of the land. Doing so may ultimately mean that the species composition of an ecofeminist restorashyn will not be purely native, but may instead include a diverse mix of both native and non-invasive, nonnative species
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics200628318
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Promise and Peril of Ecological Restoration: Why Ritual Can Make a Difference 1.Nathaniel F. Barrett - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):139 - 155.
Deep Ecology and the Foundations of Restoration.Michael Vincent McGinnis - 1996 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):203 – 217.
Preservation, Passivity, and Pessimism.Sheila Lintott - 2011 - Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):95-114.
The Politics of Ecological Restoration.Andrew Light & Eric Higgs - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):227-247.
Ecological Restoration and Environmental Ethics.Mark Cowell - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):19-32.
The Restoration of Species and Natural Environments.Alastair S. Gunn - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):291-310.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
16 ( #305,196 of 2,191,803 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,783 of 2,191,803 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature