Specifying Psychology's Observable Units: Toward an Integration of Kantor's "Behavior Segment", Skinner's "Operant", and Lee's "Deed"

Behavior and Philosophy 31:81 - 110 (2003)
Abstract
Psychologists sometimes discuss the need to refine clear designations of the observable units comprising their subject matter. This paper links such discussions to (a) Dewey and Bentley's (1949) account of specification as relatively accurate unit-designation, and (b) the logical base of scientific classifications and abstractions in observable particulars. The paper then reviews, clarifies, evaluates, and contrasts the psychological units proposed by Kantor (behavior segment), Skinner (operant), and Lee (deed). Overall, Lee's deed is found to be the sharpest, least ambiguous designation, and the only specification. Deeds, fields of contributors, and contingencies are then used to selectively integrate aspects of all three units. The resulting integration is consistent with field-based approaches to causal relations within and among units, where the noun cause is synonymous with one of many contributors. It is also applicable to the analysis of feedback loops, which are designated as circular networks of dependency among subclasses of deeds.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Explanation, Teleology, and Operant Behaviorism.Jon D. Ringen - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (June):223-253.
Skinner: From Essentialist to Selectionist Meaning.Roy A. Moxley - 1997 - Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):95 - 119.
The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency.Roy A. Moxley - 1996 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
Operant Conditioning and Teleology.Douglas V. Porpora - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):568-582.
On the Origins of Complexity.Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.
On Psychological Terms That Appeal to the Mental.J. Moore - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:167 - 186.
Are Units of Retention Necessary?Manish Vaidya - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):559-559.
Evolution and Operant Behavior, Metaphor or Theory?Frances K. McSweeney & Kenjiro Aoyama - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):545-546.
Cultural Traits and Cultural Integration.R. Lee Lyman - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):357-358.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

21 ( #232,496 of 2,153,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums