Specifying Psychology's Observable Units: Toward an Integration of Kantor's "Behavior Segment", Skinner's "Operant", and Lee's "Deed"
Behavior and Philosophy 31:81 - 110 (2003)
Psychologists sometimes discuss the need to refine clear designations of the observable units comprising their subject matter. This paper links such discussions to (a) Dewey and Bentley's (1949) account of specification as relatively accurate unit-designation, and (b) the logical base of scientific classifications and abstractions in observable particulars. The paper then reviews, clarifies, evaluates, and contrasts the psychological units proposed by Kantor (behavior segment), Skinner (operant), and Lee (deed). Overall, Lee's deed is found to be the sharpest, least ambiguous designation, and the only specification. Deeds, fields of contributors, and contingencies are then used to selectively integrate aspects of all three units. The resulting integration is consistent with field-based approaches to causal relations within and among units, where the noun cause is synonymous with one of many contributors. It is also applicable to the analysis of feedback loops, which are designated as circular networks of dependency among subclasses of deeds.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Explanation, Teleology, and Operant Behaviorism.Jon D. Ringen - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (June):223-253.
What Is Defined in Operational Definitions? The Case of Operant Psychology.Emilio Ribes-Iñesta - 2003 - Behavior and Philosophy 31:111 - 126.
Skinner: From Essentialist to Selectionist Meaning.Roy A. Moxley - 1997 - Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):95 - 119.
The Import of Skinner's Three-Term Contingency.Roy A. Moxley - 1996 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):145 - 167.
Beyond Trial-and-Error in a Selectionist Psychology.J. M. Cleaveland - 2002 - Behavior and Philosophy 30:73 - 99.
Is the Operant Contingency Enough for a Science of Purposive Behavior?William Timberlake - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):197 - 229.
Operant Conditioning and Teleology.Douglas V. Porpora - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):568-582.
On the Origins of Complexity.Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.
On Psychological Terms That Appeal to the Mental.J. Moore - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:167 - 186.
Are Units of Retention Necessary?Manish Vaidya - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):559-559.
Evolution and Operant Behavior, Metaphor or Theory?Frances K. McSweeney & Kenjiro Aoyama - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):545-546.
Cultural Traits and Cultural Integration.R. Lee Lyman - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):357-358.
On Behavioristic Versus Neurophysiologic Accounts of Psychotic Behavior.William Andrew Bradnan - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (3):289-303.
Units of Measurement and Natural Kinds: Some Kripkean Considerations. [REVIEW]J. Brakel - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (3):297 - 317.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads21 ( #232,496 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?