Against causal descriptivism

Mind and Society 5 (1):78-84 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Causal descriptivism and its relative nominal descriptivism are critically examined. It is argued that they do not manage to undermine the principal conclusions of the new theory of reference

Similar books and articles

Locke-ing onto content.Frank Jackson - 2001 - In D. Walsh (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 127-143.
Masters of our meanings.David Braddon-Mitchell - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):133-52.
Millian descriptivism.Ben Caplan - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):181-198.
Epistemic two-dimensionalism and the epistemic argument.Jeff Speaks - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59 – 78.
The Epistemological Argument Against Descriptivism.Robin Jeshion - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):325 - 345.
Causal descriptivism.Frederick W. Kroon - 1987 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (1):1 – 17.
In Defense of a Kripkean Dogma.Jonathan Ichikawa, Ishani Maitra & Brian Weatherson - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):56-68.
Rigidification and attitudes.Bryan Pickel - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):43-58.
Descriptivism, rigidified and anchored.Philip Pettit - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):323-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
628 (#14,922)

6 months
84 (#11,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Panu Raatikainen
Tampere University