Beauty, Ethics and Numbers in Boethius’ Quadrivial Treatises

Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 11 (1):67-79 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The convergence of the Neoplatonic/Neopythagorean approach with the Aristotelian organization of the sciences is one of the most interesting features that characterizes the two influential mathematical treatises on On Arithmetics and On Music by Severinus Boethius. Basing his reasoning on Nicomachus and Ptolemy, Boethius follows the philosophical tradition that had tried to reconcile Plato’s and Aristotle’s views. This attitude is examined in the present paper as regards Boethius’ response concerning the relation between numbers, ethics and aesthetics. His view emerges as coming out of a rather complex construction, which assigns the ethical scope of mathematics in indicating to the human mind how to correct the ratios that realize the best relationship in movements of the soul and the body. More precisely, its ethical aim is to correct the specific form of movement of human beings, that is their actions, exemplified in the way in which mathematical ratios represent the forms of government and musical ratios evoke and heal psychophysical affections. More complex, on the other hand, is the relationship between mathematics and beauty. In clear antithesis to the position taken by Augustine on the beauty of the rhythmic patterns that better represent the beauty of unity, Boethius does not relate the mathematical ratios of the consonances to an esthetical judgment by making use of the category of beauty. For him, the physical world is totally immersed in changes and movements, and this cannot but impede things from expressing the stable unity, which is required for contemplating the beautiful.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Boethius.John Marenbon - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Cambridge Companion to Boethius.John Marenbon (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boethius: an essay.Hugh Fraser Stewart - 1891 - New York: B. Franklin.
Der göttliche intellectus: ein irrationales Konzept von Überrationalität? Zu Lorenzo Vallas Boethius-Kritik.Hartmut Westermann - 2009 - Studia Philosophica: Jahrbuch Der Schweizerischen Philosoph Ischen Gesellschaft, Annuaire de la Société Suisse de Philosphie 68:105-120.
Boethius on the aim of Aristotle’s Categories.Tomasz Tiuryn - 2009 - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 54.
Reflections on Mathematics and Aesthetics.John L. Bell - 2015 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 8 (1):159-179.
Boethius on Human Freedom.Paul J. LaChance - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):309-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-25

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references