Chinese Philosophy and Woman: Is Reconciliation Possible?


Authors
Ann A. Pang-White
University of Scranton
Abstract
Is a reconciliation possible between Chinese philosophy and woman when taking into account infamous gender-oppressive cultural practices such as foot-binding, concubinage, etc., in premodern Chinese societies? The article tackles the complexity of the subject by calling the readers' attention to texts from Confucian classics that indeed support intellectual equality of the sexes and classless access to education, while noting diverging historical cultural evidences of women's education and their social status in premodern, modern, and postmodern Chinese societies. The article challenges the belief that Confucian philosophy is unequivocally a sexist ideology to be a foregone conclusion. While not intending to exonerate Confucian philosophy from its opponents' charges, the article questions the adequateness of Western liberal feminism as the means to reappropriate Confucian philosophy. It suggests that a more culturally sensitive approach coupling with better historical and contextual analysis would prove to be both helpful and necessary.
Keywords Feminism  Women  Confucius  Education  Gender  History  Chinese Philosophy  Social philosophy  Comparative Studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Is Comparative Philosophy Comparing?Raimundo Panikkar - 1988 - In Eliot Deutsch & Gerald James Larson (eds.), Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy. Princeton University Press. pp. 116-136.
Comparative Philosophy: What It Is and What It Ought to Be.Daya Krishna - 1988 - In Gerald James Larson & Eliot Deutsch (eds.), Interpreting Across Boundaries: New Essays in Comparative Philosophy. Princeton University Press. pp. 71-83.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Caring in Confucian Philosophy.Ann A. Pang-White - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (6):374-384.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Problems on Chinese Feminism.He Ping - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 25:29-36.
Gender Sceptics and Feminist Politics.Mari Mikkola - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):361-380.
Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender.Mari Mikkola - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Zhu Xi on Family and Women: Challenges and Potentials.Ann A. Pang-White - 2013 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (3-4):436-455.
Confucius: A Guide for the Perplexed.Yong Huang - 2013 - Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer. pp. 67--83.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-08-16

Total views
41 ( #259,704 of 2,444,785 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 2,444,785 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes