- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Inferring the intentional states of autonomous virtual agents
Peter C. Pantelis, Chris L. Baker, Steven A. Cholewiak, Kevin Sanik, Ari Weinstein, Chia-Chien Wu, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Jacob Feldman
Cognition 130 (3):360-379 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ma-kʻo-ssu che hsüeh chien chieh yü pʻing chia.Tʻing-Tung Yüan - 1975 - Tʻai-chung : Kuang chʻi chʻu pan she,:
Neural Dynamic Principles for an Intentional Embodied Agent.Jan Tekülve & Gregor Schöner - 2024 - Cognitive Science 48 (9):e13491.
Creativity, cognition and material culture: An introduction.Lambros Malafouris, Chris Gosden & Karenleigh A. Overmann - 2014 - Pragmatics and Cognition 22 (1):1-4.
Replies to Gert, Hurley, and Tenenbaum.Douglas W. Portmore - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):241-255.
Evaluating the models and behaviour of 3D intelligent virtual animals in a predator-prey relationship. AAMAS (Autonomous Agents and Multiagents Systems) 2012: 79-86, http://http://aamas2012.webs.upv.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=27&Itemid=27.Deborah Richards & Jacobson Michael - 2012 - AAMAS (Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems).
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#509,172)
6 months
9 (#700,914)
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#509,172)
6 months
9 (#700,914)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Pragmatic Approach to the Intentional Stance Semantic, Empirical and Ethical Considerations for the Design of Artificial Agents.Guglielmo Papagni & Sabine Koeszegi - 2021 - Minds and Machines 31 (4):505-534.
Lucky or clever? From expectations to responsibility judgments.Tobias Gerstenberg, Tomer D. Ullman, Jonas Nagel, Max Kleiman-Weiner, David A. Lagnado & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2018 - Cognition 177 (C):122-141.
Toward a Perceptual Account of Mindreading.Somogy Varga - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2):380-401.
A decision network account of reasoning about other people’s choices.Alan Jern & Charles Kemp - 2015 - Cognition 142 (C):12-38.
The Cognitive Architecture of Perceived Animacy: Intention, Attention, and Memory.Tao Gao, Chris L. Baker, Ning Tang, Haokui Xu & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (8):e12775.
References found in this work
Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age.György Gergely, Zoltán Nádasdy, Gergely Csibra & Szilvia Bíró - 1995 - Cognition 56 (2):165-193.
Action understanding as inverse planning.Chris L. Baker, Rebecca Saxe & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2009 - Cognition 113 (3):329-349.
Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains.Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L. Littman & Anthony R. Cassandra - 1998 - Artificial Intelligence 101 (1-2):99-134.
Simulation, theory, and content.Jane Heal - 1996 - In Peter Carruthers & Peter K. Smith (eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 75--89.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7b7f6c6655-47mn7 uwo