Aristotle on Common Perception

Apeiron 47 (3):342-55 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his account of human perception in De Anima, Aristotle focuses on characterizing special perception and its objects. This focus, however, comes at a price, as Aristotle neglects to explain why incidental and common objects should also be called objects of perception. My goal is to reconstruct on Aristotle’s behalf a plausible account of why the commons can rightly be called objects of perception.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on perception.Stephen Everson - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle on the common sense.Pavel Gregoric - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle on Perception. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barnes - 1999 - The Classical Review 49 (01):120-122.
Common sense and Berkeley's perception by suggestion.Jody Graham - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
The 'common sense' in Aristotle's theory of perception. [REVIEW]Anna Marmodoro - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):234-237.
Aristotle on Odour and Smell.Mark A. Johnstone - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43:143-83.


Added to PP

46 (#290,852)

6 months
1 (#873,176)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura Papish
George Washington University

Citations of this work

Aristotle on the Truth and Falsity of Three Sorts of Perception.Evan Keeling - 2022 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 39 (4):305-322.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references