A Priori Philosophical Intuitions: Analytic or Synthetic?

In Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism and Naturalism. London, UK: pp. 51-71 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers take the distinguishing mark of their subject to be its a priori status. In their view, where empirical science is based on the data of experience, philosophy is founded on a priori intuitions. In this paper I shall argue that there is no good sense in which philosophical knowledge is informed by a priori intuitions. Philosophical results have just the same a posteriori status as scientific theories. My strategy will be to pose a familiar dilemma for the friends of a priori philosophical intuitions. I shall ask them whether their intuitions are supposed to be analytic or synthetic. And then I shall argue that, if the intuitions are analytic, they may be a priori, but will be philosophically uninteresting; while, if they are synthetic, they may be philosophically interesting, but will not merit being treated as a priori in the context of philosophical debate. At the end of the paper I explain that this does not mean that philosophy should abandon ‘armchair’ methods. We still need to uncover and examine the often unrecognized intuitions that drive our thinking. However this is not because they provide a distinctive source of a priori knowledge, but on the contrary because they may be leading us astray.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The third thing in synthetic judgement a priori in Kant's Philosophy.Reza Mahoozi - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 3 (214):89-104.
Kant's theory of definition.Lewis White Beck - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (2):179-191.
Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?Colin Marshall - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576.
The synthetic a priori in Kant and German idealism.Seung-Kee Lee - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328.
Problem syntetyczności sądów a priori w ujęciu Hermanna Lotzego.Wojciech Hanuszkiewicz - 2012 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 2 (2):363-376.
Infallible A Priori Self-Justifying Propositions.Glen Hoffmann - 2012 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):55-68.
Kant's Theory of Definition.Lewis Beck - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 18:178-197.
Non‐Analytic Logic.Hartley Slater - 2014 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (3):195-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-15

Downloads
123 (#147,001)

6 months
54 (#83,945)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Papineau
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references