Flickers of freedom and Frankfurt-style cases in the light of the new incompatibilism of the stit theory

Journal of Philosophical Research 27:553-565 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Frankfurt-style examples aim to undermine the principle that moral responsibility requires the ability to do otherwise, which in turn requires the availability of alternate possibilities.1 They are thus considered a reason for refuting incompatibilism. One lesson drawn from Frankfurt-style examples is exemplified by the compatibilist account of Fischer and Ravizza.2 They accept the impact of Frankfurt-style cases and hold that the incompatibilist requirement of regulative control, which involves the agent’s ability to perform the action and her ability to perform the contrary action, must be dropped. In its stead, they propose the weaker requirement of guidance control, which only demands the agent’s causal control over the action for which she is to be held responsible.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

81 (#207,875)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katarzyna Paprzycka-Hausman
University of Warsaw

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references