We are all physicalists now. It was not always so. A hundred years ago most educated thinkers had no doubt that non-physical processes occurred within living bodies and intelligent minds. Nor was this an anti-scientific stance: the point would have been happily agreed by most practicing scientists of the time. Yet nowadays anybody who says that minds and bodies involve non-physical processes is regarded as a crank. This is a profound intellectual shift. In this essay I want to explore its methodological implications for the human sciences. I do not think that these have been adequately appreciated.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review of The Mind Incarnate by Lawrence A. Shapiro. [REVIEW]Thomas W. Polger - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Science 8:394-95.
Archaeology and Cognitive Evolution.Thomas Wynn - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):389-402.
The Complexity of Living Bodies and the Structure of Biological Theories.David B. Kitts - 1983 - Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3):195-205.
Virtuous Bodies: The Physical Dimensions of Morality in Buddhist Ethics.Susanne Mrozik - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads12 ( #380,730 of 2,177,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,205 of 2,177,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?