There Are No Norms of Belief
In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press (2013)
Abstract
This paper argues that there is no distinctive species of normativity attaching to the adoption of beliefs.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Norms, Naturalism and Epistemology: The Case for Science Without Norms.Jonathan Knowles - 2003 - Palgrave.
Hypothetical and Categorical Epistemic Normativity.Chase B. Wrenn - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):273-290.
Does belief (only) aim at the truth?Daniel Whiting - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Naturalizm bez normatywności? Głos w obronie epistemologii znaturalizowanej.Barbara Trybulec - 2008 - Filozofia Nauki 2.
On the aim of belief.David Velleman - 2000 - In The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press. pp. 244--81.
Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed.Michael Bergmann - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198-207.
Against Belief Normativity.Kathrin Glüer & Åsa Wikforss - 2013 - In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-10-11
Downloads
306 (#39,190)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2011-10-11
Downloads
306 (#39,190)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
No Exception for Belief.Susanna Rinard - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):121-143.
There is a distinctively epistemic kind of blame.Cameron Boult - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (3):518-534.
