Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):299 - 314 (1996)
Abstract |
MATHEMATICAL RESOLUTIONS OF ZENO’s PARADOXES of motion have been offered on a regular basis since the paradoxes were first formulated. In this paper I will argue that such mathematical “solutions” miss, and always will miss, the point of Zeno’s arguments. I do not think that any mathematical solution can provide the much sought after answers to any of the paradoxes of Zeno. In fact all mathematical attempts to resolve these paradoxes share a common feature, a feature that makes them consistently miss the fundamental point which is Zeno’s concern for the one-many relation, or it would be better to say, lack of relation. This takes us back to the ancient dispute between the Eleatic school and the Pluralists. The first, following Parmenide’s teaching, claimed that only the One or identical can be thought and is therefore real, the second held that the Many of becoming is rational and real.1 I will show that these mathematical “solutions” do not actually touch Zeno’s argument and make no metaphysical contribution to the problem of understanding what is motion against immobility, or multiplicity against identity, which was Zeno’s challenge. I would like to point out at this stage that my contention.
|
Keywords | Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy General Interest |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0034-6632 |
DOI | revmetaph1996502199 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion Are Actually About Immobility.Bathfield Maël - 2018 - Foundations of Science 23 (4):649-679.
Temporal Relations Vs. Logical Reduction: A Phenomenal Theory of Causality. [REVIEW]Alba Papa-Grimaldi - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (3):339-358.
Similar books and articles
What the Liar Taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Zeno’s Boêtheia Tôi Logôi.Phil Hopkins - 2006 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):1-25.
Zeno's Paradoxes. A Cardinal Problem. 1. On Zenonian Plurality.Karin Verelst - 2006 - In J. Šķilters (ed.), Paradox: Logical, Cognitive and Communicative Aspects. Proceedings of the First International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication,. University of Latvia Press.
Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion.Adolf Grünbaum - 1970 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 200--250.
Lamps, Cubes, Balls and Walls: Zeno Problems and Solutions.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (1):49 - 59.
Modern Science and the Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno.Adolf Grünbaum - 1955 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 164--175.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
224 ( #39,987 of 2,411,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #42,579 of 2,411,745 )
2009-01-28
Total views
224 ( #39,987 of 2,411,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #42,579 of 2,411,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads