Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno's Paradoxes Miss the Point: Zeno's One and Many Relation and Parmenides' Prohibition

Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):299 - 314 (1996)
Abstract
MATHEMATICAL RESOLUTIONS OF ZENO’s PARADOXES of motion have been offered on a regular basis since the paradoxes were first formulated. In this paper I will argue that such mathematical “solutions” miss, and always will miss, the point of Zeno’s arguments. I do not think that any mathematical solution can provide the much sought after answers to any of the paradoxes of Zeno. In fact all mathematical attempts to resolve these paradoxes share a common feature, a feature that makes them consistently miss the fundamental point which is Zeno’s concern for the one-many relation, or it would be better to say, lack of relation. This takes us back to the ancient dispute between the Eleatic school and the Pluralists. The first, following Parmenide’s teaching, claimed that only the One or identical can be thought and is therefore real, the second held that the Many of becoming is rational and real.1 I will show that these mathematical “solutions” do not actually touch Zeno’s argument and make no metaphysical contribution to the problem of understanding what is motion against immobility, or multiplicity against identity, which was Zeno’s challenge. I would like to point out at this stage that my contention.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632  
DOI revmetaph1996502199
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Presumption of Movement.Alba Papa-Grimaldi - 2007 - Axiomathes 17 (2):137-154.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What the Liar Taught Achilles.Gary Mar & Paul St Denis - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion.Adolf Grünbaum - 1970 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 200--250.
Zeno's Paradoxes.Wesley C. Salmon (ed.) - 1970 - Bobbs-Merrill.
Zeno's Boêtheia Tôi Logôi.Phil Hopkins - 2006 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):1-25.
Zeno's Paradoxes.Nicholas Huggett - forthcoming - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Modern Science and the Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno.Adolf Grünbaum - 1955 - In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 164--175.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
132 ( #37,062 of 2,180,798 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #48,993 of 2,180,798 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums