Hastings Center Report 35 (3):34-41 (2005)

Authors
Abstract
: The differences between critics and proponents of enhancement technologies are easily overblown. Both sides of this debate share the moral ideal of being "authentic" to oneself. They differ in how they prefer to understand authenticity, but even this difference is not as stark as it sometimes seems
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hcr.2005.0067
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,064
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Myth of Cognitive Enhancement Drugs.Hazem Zohny - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (3):257-269.
The Case for Conserving Disability.Rosemarie Garland-Thomson - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (3):339-355.

View all 43 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
119 ( #87,337 of 2,439,610 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #282,463 of 2,439,610 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes