A new definition of privacy for the law
Law and Philosophy 2 (3):305 - 338 (1983)
Abstract
The paper begins with a defence of a new definition of privacy as the absence of undocumented personal knowledge. In the middle section, I criticise alternative accounts of privacy. Finally, I show how my definition can be worked into contemporary American Law.My notes
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
155 (#77,985)
6 months
1 (#386,040)
2009-01-28
Downloads
155 (#77,985)
6 months
1 (#386,040)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Breaking the Privacy Paradox: The Value of Privacy and Associated Duty of Firms.Kirsten Martin - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (1):65-96.
How We Can Make Sense of Control-Based Intuitions for Limited Access-Conceptions of the Right to Privacy.Björn Lundgren - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 20 (3).
Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why?Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201-215.
A Critical Contribution to Theoretical Foundations of Privacy Studies.Thomas Allmer - 2011 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 9 (2):83-101.
Similar books and articles
Strengthening Uniform Privacy Principles: An Analysis of the Alrc's Proposed Principles.Graham Greenleaf, Nigel Waters & Lee A. Bygrave - unknown
Defining Privacy in Employee Health Screening Cases: Ethical Ramifications Concerning the Employee/Employer Relationship. [REVIEW]Michele Simms - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):315 - 325.
Values Education and the Right to Privacy.Alan L. Lockwood - 1977 - Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):9-26.
In Support of a Statutory Privacy Action in Australian Law.Graham Greenleaf & Nigel Waters - unknown
Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health. [REVIEW]Lawrence O. Gostin - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):321-335.
A Cognitive Access Definition of Privacy.Madison Powers - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (4):369 - 386.
