Bioethicists Are More Like Bricoleurs than Engineers: Reflections on Fredrik Svenaeus' Phenomenological Bioethics

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 28 (4):479-486 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In America in the 1960s, ethics was out of fashion. Scientists tended to think it was as wooly and "ideological" as religion, and many philosophers agreed. But advances in the biosciences and biotechnologies made the need for ethical reflection hard to ignore. Ethics needed what today we would call rebranding.The new field devoted to questions arising with advances in the biosciences and biotechnologies would be called "bioethics." As theologian Warren Reich put it when reflecting back on the birth of bioethics in the late 1960s, The field of bioethics started with the word bioethics because the word is so suggestive and so powerful; it suggests a new focus, a new bringing together of disciplines in a new way with...

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-30

Downloads
55 (#358,353)

6 months
12 (#232,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik Parens
Hastings Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Mangle of Practice.Andrew Pickering & Jed Z. Buchwald - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):479-482.
La estructura de las revoluciones científicas.Thomas Kühn - 1992 - Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 40 (101):179-190.

View all 7 references / Add more references