Contractarian Liberal Ethics and the Theory of Rational Choice

Dissertation, Emory University (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


One of the most conspicuous recent phenomena in the domain of moral and political philosophy has been the revival of social contract theory. From John Rawls to David Gauthier, contractarians have attempted to construct their methodological foundations on the theory of rational choice. The inspiration for the theory of rational choice has been the neo-classical conception of rational economic man. This theory seems to provide contractarian ethics with a concrete model for reducing the principles of social choice for justice to the principles of rational individual choice. ;This study identifies the four methodological foundations of contractarian ethics . These foundations are the justification for contractarian consensus, non-altruistic clear choice motivation, the possibility of contractarian consensus in the circumstances of pluralism or relativism of individual autonomous values, and a neutral Archimedean criterion for assessing the justness of a society. ;However, this study shows that the theory is no guarantee of the validity of these four foundations in view of four corresponding predicaments. The predicaments are the dilemma of moral irrelevancy or circularity held between rationality and morality, indeterminacy between various rational choice models, incompetent assessment of the contents of individual values as well as insufficient political sensibility of prevalent conflicts of individual values, and non-neutrality resulting from the futility or the flight from liberal historical cultures. ;In effect, contractarian ethics is exactly contractarian liberal ethics. Overall the present impasse of contractarian liberal ethics is derived from the methodological aspect of rational foundationalism and from the substantial aspect of individual liberalism. This study also reveals that the four predicaments have a deeper root in Western modernity itself. However, various historical and contemporary alternatives to contractarian liberal ethics appear to have no capacity to overcome the deeply rooted predicaments. If this is the case, as an important agenda for the future of the moral and political philosophy, the question "After Contractarian Liberal Ethics: End or Transformation?" must be taken seriously.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Evolution of Distributive Justice.Jason Mckenzie Alexander - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Occurrent Contractarianism: A Preference-Based Ethical Theory.R. Malcolm Murray - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Morality, Rational Choice, and Semantic Representation.David Gauthier - 1988 - Social Philosophy and Policy 5 (2):173.
Accounting for political preferences: Cultural theory vs. cultural history.Jeffrey Friedman - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (3):325-351.
Rational Choice Theories of Justice.Calum Alasdair Macdonald - 1992 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Rational choice theory.William J. Goode - 1997 - American Sociologist 28 (2):22.
Rational Choice and Moral Theory.Edward F. McClennen - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):521-540.
Rawls' Avowed Error in Rational Contractarianism.Jung Soon Park - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:325-340.


Added to PP


6 months

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references