Critical Reflections on Conventional Concepts and Beliefs in Bioethics

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (1):1-9 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An important role of the philosopher is to critically reflect on what is often taken for granted, using the tools of argument and analysis. This article engages with six different papers that offer critical reflections on conventional concepts and beliefs in bioethics regarding informed consent, continuous deep sedation, traditional moral theories underlying bioethical thinking, the definition of mental disease, and codes of ethics for particular medical specialties.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Reflections on Critical Thinking and Mental Health.Tom Gilbert - 2003 - Teaching Philosophy 26 (4):333-349.
Should Religious Beliefs Be Exempt from the Duty to Think Critically?Donald Hatcher - 2014 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 29 (1):17-31.
Constructing Critical Bioethics by Deconstructing Culture/nature Dualism.Richard Twine - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (3):285-295.
An apology for socratic bioethics.Franklin G. Miller & Robert D. Truog - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):3 – 7.
Breast cancer genetic screening and critical bioethics' gaze.Lisa S. Parker - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):313-337.
Thinking across species—a critical bioethics approach to enhancement.Richard Twine - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-15

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?