Can the bundle theory save substantivalism from the hole argument?

One of the most serious theoretical obstacles to contemporary spacetime substantivalism is Earman and Norton's hole argument. We argue that applying the bundle theory of substance to spacetime points allows spacetime substantivalists to escape the conclusion of this argument. Some philosophers have claimed that the bundle theory cannot be applied to substantival spacetime in this way due to problems in individuating spacetime points in symmetrical spacetimes. We demonstrate that it is possible to overcome these difficulties if spatiotemporal properties are viewed as tropes rather than universals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/392921
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,850
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Bare Necessities.Shamik Dasgupta - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):115-160.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Albert Einstein Meets David Lewis.Jeremy Butterfield - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:65-81.
What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
Einstein Algebras and the Hole Argument.Jonathan Bain - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085.
Spacetime as a Fundamental and Inalienable Structure of Fields.Y. S. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (2):205-215.
The Hole Argument.John Norton - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:56 - 64.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
57 ( #101,478 of 2,214,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,607 of 2,214,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature