Nature as a moral resource

Environmental Ethics 6 (2):101-130 (1984)
In this paper I attempt a moral justification of protecting wild species, ecosystems, and landscapes, a justification not directly grounded in appeals to human benefit. I begin with a description of anthropocentric and ecosystemic approaches to the valuing of nature and offer some empirical arguments in support of the ecosystemic view. I suggest that human beings have a genetic need for natural environments, and that the direct experience of wild nature is an intrinsic good. Theoretical coherence and scope is another advantage of the ecological perspective over the anthropocentric view. Turning to moral psychology, I argue that human beings have a fundamental need to care for things outside themselves and that this need is suitably met, and human life enriched, by a transcending concern for the well-being of natural species, habitats, and ecosystems . These considerations are joined with the ecological point of view to yield the conclusion that a self-transcending concern for the welfare of wild species and their habitats enriches the quality of moral life. Persons with genuine reverence and respect for wild creatures and their habitats will enjoy greater fulfilment in their own lives and be better neighbors toeach other
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275  
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics19846235
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ethics and the Extraterrestrial Environment.Alan Marshall - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):227-236.
Environmental Ethics and Size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Naturalism and Environmentalism: A Reply to Hinchman.Brian H. Baxter - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (1):51 - 68.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Can and Ought We to Follow Nature? Rolston - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (1):7-30.
Objective Value in Environmental Ethics.Sharon Anderson-Gold - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:111-124.
“Our Fellow Creatures”.Jeff McMahan - 2005 - Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):353 - 380.
The Moral Status of Non-Human Beings and Their Ecosystems.Michel Dion - 2000 - Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):221 – 229.
Nature and Morality.Roger Paden - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (3):239-251.
Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature.Allen W. Wood - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):189–210.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
7 ( #538,497 of 2,197,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #298,964 of 2,197,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature