Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):133-136 (2006)

Stewart and DeMarco’s economic theory of patient decision-making applied to the case of diabetes is flawed by clinical inaccuracies and an unrealistic depiction of patients as rational traders. The theory incorrectly represents patients’ struggles to optimize their management as calculated trade-offs against the costs of care, and gives an unrealistic, inflexible account of such costs. It imputes to physicians the view that their patients’ lack of compliance is unreasonable, but physicians are accustomed to the variety of human factors which contribute to suboptimal compliance, and work with patients to minimize their influence. By depicting patients as rational traders rather than human beings with a range of motivations and burdens, the economic theory distorts the proper function of informed consent.
Keywords 750403 Bioethics  C1  321213 Human Bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-006-9021-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,981
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Economic Theory of Patient Decision-Making.Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rejoinder.Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):137-138.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
68 ( #150,371 of 2,427,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #533,878 of 2,427,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes