Paradox with just Self-Reference

T. Parent
Virginia Tech
If a semantically open language has no constraints on self-reference, one can show there is a predicate which is both satisfied and unsatisfied by a self-referring term. The argument requires diagonalization on a definition-scheme for the predicate ‘x is Lagadonian’. (The term ‘Lagadonian’ is adapted from David Lewis). Briefly, a self-referring term is counted as “Lagadonian” if the initial variable in the schema is replaced with the term itself. But the same term is not counted as Lagadonian if this variable is replaced with the quotation or other name for the term. Thus the term both satisfies and does not satisfy ‘x is Lagadonian’. Finally, a related paradox is presented, which requires no self-referring name; it rather depends on a definite description for the sentence containing the description.
Keywords Self-Reference  Circularity  Paradox  Yablo, Stephen  Tarski, Alfred  Godel, Kurt
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,926
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
On the Plurality of Worlds.Allen Stairs - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (2):333-352.
Paradox Without Self-Reference.Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):251.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Circularity is Still Scary.Paula Teijeiro - 2012 - Análisis Filosófico 32 (1):31-35.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Yablo's Paradox and Referring to Infinite Objects.O. Bueno & M. Colyvan - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.
Rosser-Type Undecidable Sentences Based on Yablo’s Paradox.Taishi Kurahashi - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):999-1017.
Circularity and Paradox.Stephen Yablo - 2006 - In Thomas Bolander, Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Pedersen (eds.), Self-Reference. CSLI Publications. pp. 139--157.
Gödelizing the Yablo Sequence.Cezary Cieśliński & Rafal Urbaniak - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):679-695.
Arithmetical and Specular Self-Reference.Damjan Bojadžiev - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):55-63.
Disquotationalism, Reference, and Object Dependence.Anthony Everett - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):939-955.
Dangerous Reference Graphs and Semantic Paradoxes.Landon Rabern, Brian Rabern & Matthew Macauley - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):727-765.


Added to PP index

Total views
139 ( #61,823 of 2,310,251 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #59,124 of 2,310,251 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature