Possible Worlds Semantics and Linguistic Theory

The Monist 60 (3):303-326 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to argue for the fruitfulness for linguistic theory of an approach to semantics that has been developed primarily by logicians and philosophers. That the theory of possible worlds semantics has been extremely fruitful for logic and philosophy is widely if not universally accepted, and I will not try to convince remaining skeptics on that score. But the goals of linguistics are sufficiently different from those of philosophy and logic that there are independent and highly reasonable grounds for skepticism about the appropriateness of such a theory for linguistics, and I will address what seem to me the most important of these in addition to offering positive evidence in favor of such an approach to semantics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,445

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Game-Theoretical Semantics.Esa Saarinen - 1977 - The Monist 60 (3):406-418.
I-Semantics: Foundational Questions.Adriano Marques da Silva - 2017 - Studia Semiotyczne 31 (2):77-112.
Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact.Barbara H. Partee - 2010 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1).
Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics.Ruth M. Kempson - 1975 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Is a Possible-worlds Semantics of Modality Possible? A Problem for Kratzer's Semantics.Zsófia Zvolenszky - 2002 - Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT):339-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
193 (#116,307)

6 months
18 (#141,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?