Authors
Derek Parfit
Oxford University
Abstract
One theory about rationality is the Self-interest Theory, or S. S claims that what each of us has most reason to do is whatever would be best for himself. And it is irrational for anyone to do what he knows would be worse for himself. When morality conflicts with self-interest, many people would reject the Self-interest Theory. But most of these people would accept one of the claims that S makes. This is the claim that we should not care less about our further future, simply because it is further in the future. We should not, for example, postpone pains at the foreseen cost of making them much worse. In our concern for our own self-interest, we should give equal weight to all the parts of our future. In this paper I shall discuss how a Self-interest Theorist should defend this claim.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1984
DOI 10.1093/aristotelian/84.1.47
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,687
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

When the Future Feels Worse Than the Past: A Temporal Inconsistency in Moral Judgment.Eugene M. Caruso - 2010 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139 (4):610-624.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
78 ( #132,432 of 2,432,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #83,835 of 2,432,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes