Rescuing Reflection

Philosophy of Science 79 (4):473-489 (2012)

Authors
Ilho Park
Korea University (PhD)
Abstract
In this article, I suggest an argument that seems to show a conflict between the reflection principle and conditionalization. In particular, I show that when the reflection principle is formulated in a standard way, the principle conflicts with Jeffrey conditionalization. And it is argued that the source of the conflict resides in an ambiguity of the standard formulation. Furthermore, I attempt to rescue the principle using Bayes factors. That is, I suggest a new formulation of the principle so as to avoid the conflict.
Keywords The Reflection Principle  Jeffrey Conditionalization  Bayes Factors
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/668001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,000
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conditionalization, Reflection, and Self-Knowledge.Jonathan Weisberg - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):179-197.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-17

Total views
51 ( #149,539 of 2,236,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #462,909 of 2,236,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature