The Premise Paradox

Authors
T. Parent
Virginia Tech
Abstract
This paper argues that if our talk of “premises” is not handled carefully, a classical language will contain sentences that are both true and false. This is so, even if a “premise” is defined in non-semantic terms, viz., as a sentence that is underived in the context of a proof. As a preliminary, I first explain that in classical logic, expressions must be seen as linguistic types rather than tokens. (Otherwise, ‘this very term = this very term’ is a false instance of the Law of Identity.) Yet, if expressions are types, one can then derive a contradiction from the following premises: (1) Socrates is mortal; (2) (5) is not a premise, In the relevant proof, (5) is a derived sentence that is type-identical to ‘Socrates is mortal’. In such a proof, one can then show that sentence (1) is not a premise. A more sophisticated, proof-theoretic version of the paradox is also presented.
Keywords Types and tokens  Proof theory  Self-reference, circularity, and reflexivity  Argument theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,146
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Proof-Relevance of Families of Setoids and Identity in Type Theory.Erik Palmgren - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1-2):35-47.
An Intensional Type Theory: Motivation and Cut-Elimination.Paul C. Gilmore - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):383-400.
An Intensional Type Theory: Motivation and Cut-Elimination.Paul Gilmore - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):383-400.
Is There a Metaphysical Proof of God's Existence?Piotr Moskal - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):167-175.
The Paradox of the Non-Communicator.Theodore Drange - 1964 - Philosophical Studies 15 (6):92 - 96.
Conceptual Structure of Classical Logic.John Corcoran - 1972 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (1):25-47.
Duns Scotus on the Possibility of an Infinite Being.A. P. Martinich - 1982 - Philosophical Topics 13 (Supplement):23-29.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-04

Total downloads
20 ( #320,895 of 2,308,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #24,763 of 2,308,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature