Why Frege Should Not Have Said "The Concept Horse is Not a Concept"

History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):449 - 465 (1986)
Frege held various views about language and its relation to non-linguistic things. These views led him to the paradoxical-sounding conclusion that "the concept horse is NOT a concept." A key assumption that led him to say this is the assumption that phrases beginning with the definite article "the" denote objects, not concepts. In sections I-III this issue is explained. In sections IV-V Frege's theory is articulated, and it is shown that he was incorrect in thinking that this theory led to the conclusion that "the concept horse is not a concept." Section VI goes on to show that his strict theory about the functioning of ordinary language is inconsistent. Sections VII-VIII investigate Frege's reasons for thinking that "the concept horse" must denote an object; these reasons are not adequate on Frege's own grounds. Section IX sketches a systematic way to allow such phrases to denote concepts (not objects) within the framework of Frege's main views about language. Section X comments briefly on the consequences of this idea for his logistic program.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Impure Reference: A Way Around the Concept Horse Paradox.Fraser MacBride - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):297-312.
The Reference Principle.Alex Oliver - 2005 - Analysis 65 (287):177–187.
Frege's Context Principle: An Interpretation.Joongol Kim - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):193-213.
The Unnameable.Alasdair Urquhart - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):119-135.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kerry und Frege über Begriff und Gegenstand.Eva Picardi - 1994 - History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (1):9-32.
Frege's Concept Paradox and the Mirroring Principle.Mark Textor - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):126-148.
Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.
Why Frege Did Not Deserve His Granum Salis.Crispin Wright - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 55:239-263.
Frege: Two Theses, Two Senses.Carlo Penco - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):87-109.
Frege's Theory of Judgement.David Andrew Bell - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
95 ( #55,143 of 2,180,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #302,815 of 2,180,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums