Metaphilosophy 41 (5):642-648 (2010)

Authors
Alexander Paseau
Oxford University
Abstract
Abstract: This article presents and solves a puzzle about methodological naturalism. Trumping naturalism is the thesis that we must accept p if science sanctions p, and biconditional naturalism the apparently stronger thesis that we must accept p if and only if science sanctions p. The puzzle is generated by an apparently cogent argument to the effect that trumping naturalism is equivalent to biconditional naturalism. It turns out that the argument for this equivalence is subtly question-begging. The article explains this and shows more generally that there are no scientific arguments for biconditional naturalism
Keywords methodological naturalism  scientism  biconditional naturalism  trumping naturalism  epistemic fundamentalism  consistency  science and philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01663.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Possibility of Naturalized Metaphysics.Rasmus Jaksland - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Copenhagen

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Naturalism and the Problem of Intentionality.Michael Tye - 1994 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):122-42.
Naturalism in Mathematics and the Authority of Philosophy.Alexander Paseau - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):377-396.
Wigner’s Puzzle for Mathematical Naturalism.Sorin Bangu - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):245-263.
Naturally Understanding Naturalism.Stewart Goetz - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):79-90.
Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century.Robert Audi - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.
Naturalism in Question.Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.) - 2004 - Harvard University Press.
Three Sorts of Naturalism.Hans Fink - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):202–221.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-10-16

Total views
80 ( #129,462 of 59,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #293,757 of 59,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes