Boecio y la división de las ciencias especulativas en el De Trinitate

Alpha Omega 4 (1):67-86 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Boethius can be considered as the ideal middleman between the Greek Roman classical world and the medieval one. His influence in the western thought is difficult to gauge. In the article we point out the continuity of thought between Aristotle, Boethius, and successively Thomas Aquinas, in a very important epistemological question: the division of the speculative sciences. Boethius addresses the topic on two occasions: in the first commentary to Porphyry's Isagoge, and in the brief treatise De Trinitate. After presenting both texts, and verifying the different philosophical contexts in which they are, we tackle the disputatio that arose over the illegitimate interpretation of some authors of the text of De Trinitate, based on the doctrine of the degrees of abstraction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The division and methods of the sciences: Questions V and VI of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius. Thomas - 1963 - Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Edited by Armand A. Maurer.
Note Novazianee.Manlio Simonetti - 2013 - Augustinianum 53 (1):77-90.
División, definición y diferencia en los "Tópicos".Andrea Falcon - 2002 - Anuario Filosófico 35 (73):297-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rafael Pascual
Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references