Genuine modal realism and completeness

Mind 115 (459):721-730 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Divers and Joseph Melia have argued that Lewis's modal realism is extensionally inadequate. This paper explains why their argument does not succeed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,445

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
130 (#151,046)

6 months
20 (#132,119)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

A. C. Paseau
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Advanced Modalizing Problems.Mark Jago - 2016 - Mind 125 (499):627-642.
Plenitude and Recombination.Alastair Wilson - 2022 - In Helen Beebee & A. R. J. Fisher (eds.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Real impossible worlds : the bounds of possibility.Ira Georgia Kiourti - 2010 - Dissertation, University of St Andrews

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
On the Plurality of Worlds.Allen Stairs - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (2):333-352.
Possible Worlds.John Divers - 2002 - Routledge.
Possible Worlds.P. Forrest - 2004 - Mind 113 (449):171-174.
Modality.Joseph Melia - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):526-528.

View all 7 references / Add more references