Australasian Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):1 – 19 (1948)
The author investigates carnap's rejection of "problems of reality" (both metaphysics and epistemology). This includes a section on positivism and ethics. He concludes that correspondence theories are untenable. (staff)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Situational Realism, Critical Realism, Causation and the Charge of Positivism.Fiona J. Hibberd - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (4):37-51.
Similar books and articles
Logical Positivism and Metaphysics: A Defence of Metaphysics Against the Logical Positivists' Criticisms.Syed A. Rahim - 1990 - Rahim Publishers.
Logical Positivism and the Mind-Body Problem.Jaegwon Kim - 2003 - In Paolo Parrini, Wes Salmon & Merrilee Salmon (eds.), Logical Empiricism: Historical & Contemporary Perspectives. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Logical Positivism, Naturalistic Epistemology, and the Foundations of Psychology.Richard F. Kitchener - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):37 - 54.
The Legacy of Logical Positivism.Peter Achinstein & Stephen Francis Barker (eds.) - 1969 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Logical Positivism (II).John Arthur Passmore - 1944 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):129-153.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #374,755 of 2,164,579 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,995 of 2,164,579 )
How can I increase my downloads?