Sharing the costs of political injustices

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):188-210 (2010)
Abstract
It is commonly thought that when democratic states act wrongly, they should bear the costs of the harm they cause. However, since states are collective agents, their financial burdens pass on to their individual citizens. This fact raises important questions about the proper distribution of the state’s collective responsibility for its unjust policies. This article identifies two opposing models for sharing this collective responsibility in democracies: first, in proportion to citizens’ personal association with the unjust policy; second, by giving each citizen an equal share of the costs. Proportional distribution is compatible with the principle of fairness. And yet, both in the literature and in political praxis we find many supporters for the equal sharing of the costs of unjust policies in democracies. How can equal distribution be defended on normative grounds? This article develops a defense that is grounded in citizens’ associative obligations. I argue that, at least in some democracies, one of the intrinsic values of the civic bond revolves around the joint formation and execution of worthy political goals. This social good generates the political associative obligation to accept an equal distribution of the costs of unjust policies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
DOI 10.1177/1470594X10368260
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Distributing States' Duties.Stephanie Collins - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (3):344-366.
Defensive Wars and the Reprisal Dilemma.Saba Bazargan - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):583-601.
Solidarity as Environmental Justice in Brownfields Remediation.Avery Kolers - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Moral Compromise, Civic Friendship, and Political Reconciliation.Simon Căbulea May - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):581-602.
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries in a Global Market Economy.Nicholas Capaldi - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:223-229.
Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies.Blain Neufeld - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
South Africa and the Prospect of Political Liberalism.Stephen de Wijze - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):48-80.
The Essential Nature of Sharing in Science.Michael J. Zigmond - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):783-799.
Added to PP index
2010-11-30

Total downloads
37 ( #143,328 of 2,193,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,980 of 2,193,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature